Skip to content
zarketo

Solutions

Better context for every security team.

Each team sees a different slice of risk. These are the workflows Zarketo is designed to support — described as intended approaches, not proven outcomes.

01

Cloud Security

Posture tools report thousands of configuration findings per account, each scored in isolation. Teams struggle to tell which combinations of exposure and access actually matter.

Relevant context
  • · Network exposure and ingress
  • · Workload placement
  • · Attached identities and policies
  • · Data classification tags
Proposed workflow
Start from an exposed resource, follow the identities its workloads assume, and identify which sensitive resources fall within reach. Prioritize the edge that is cheapest to remove.
Expected value
Fewer, better-justified priorities, each backed by a path explanation that infrastructure owners can review.
What to evaluate
Read-only access scope you are comfortable granting, which accounts to include, and how data sensitivity is currently labelled.

02

Application Security

Dependency and code findings accumulate faster than they can be triaged, and most lack any indication of whether the affected code is deployed or reachable.

Relevant context
  • · Manifests and lockfiles
  • · Image digests
  • · Deployed services and routes
  • · Runtime identity
Proposed workflow
Join findings to the artifacts that ship them, then to the services running those artifacts and their exposure. Annotate reachability evidence where available.
Expected value
Engineers receive findings with deployment context attached, so remediation effort follows real exposure.
What to evaluate
Which repositories and registries to connect, how builds map to deployments, and existing scanner outputs to reuse.

03

Identity Security

Effective access emerges from many policies, trust relationships and role chains. Over-permissioned service identities are common and rarely reviewed.

Relevant context
  • · Attached and inline policies
  • · Role assumption chains
  • · Resource policies
  • · Usage signals
Proposed workflow
Compute what each identity can effectively reach, compare it to observed need, and highlight identities attached to exposed workloads.
Expected value
Concrete permission-scoping proposals that reduce blast radius, each tied to the paths it would break.
What to evaluate
Identity providers and cloud accounts in scope, and your tolerance for permission changes on production identities.

04

DevSecOps & Security Engineering

Security context typically arrives after deployment, disconnected from the pipelines and infrastructure code where fixes are made.

Relevant context
  • · Infrastructure-as-code
  • · Pull requests and pipelines
  • · Ownership metadata
  • · Change history
Proposed workflow
Express remediation as IaC changes, route them to owners for review in existing workflows, and reassess after merge.
Expected value
Security proposals that look like normal engineering work — reviewable, testable and reversible.
What to evaluate
Where your IaC lives, how changes are reviewed today, and who owns which services.

05

AI & Platform Engineering

AI-enabled services and agents introduce new identities, tool permissions and data flows that existing inventories do not describe.

Relevant context
  • · Agent and service identities
  • · Tool and API permissions
  • · Model and data endpoints
  • · Approval boundaries
Proposed workflow
Model agents as identities in the relationship graph, map which tools and data they can reach, and flag paths where untrusted input could influence privileged actions.
Expected value
A clear view of how AI-enabled components fit into your attack surface, before they become a blind spot.
What to evaluate
Which AI services and agents are in use, what they can call, and how approvals are enforced today.

Better context. Better security decisions.

Find the risks that matter.
Understand what to fix next.

Explore how connected security context could help your team investigate exposure, prioritize risk, and evaluate remediation.

Bring your security questions. Start with the workflow that matters most to your team.