Skip to content
zarketo

Platform overview

See the relationships behind security risk.

Zarketo is designed to move an investigation from isolated signals to a contextual risk assessment — and from there to a reviewable fix and a verified result.

01

Investigation overview

Every investigation gathers the assets, findings and identities related to a signal into one place, with a stable identifier and a clear status. The goal is a shared working surface rather than another alert queue.

  • id: ZK-1042
  • status: simulation
  • assets: 12 · paths: 3 · reviews: 2
  • opened_from: external exposure signal

02

Asset relationship visualization

Relationships are modelled as a directed graph: what is reachable, what runs where, which identity a workload assumes, and what that identity can access. Paths are presented as hypotheses with the evidence for each edge.

03

Evidence panel

Each relationship links to the data that supports it and the assumptions it depends on. Missing evidence is shown explicitly, so reviewers know what to validate.

  • EV-01 external exposure — illustrative
  • EV-02 dependency finding — observed in sim
  • EV-03 identity permissions — requires review

04

Risk prioritization

Prioritization weighs exposure, exploitability evidence, identity privilege and asset sensitivity together. Factors stay visible and explainable instead of collapsing into an opaque number.

  • exposure ........ public
  • exploitability .. not established
  • privilege ....... wildcard read
  • sensitivity ..... customer records

05

Remediation proposal

Proposed fixes are expressed as concrete changes — often infrastructure-as-code diffs or permission scopes — with expected effect, side effects and residual risk, ready for owner review.

- resources = ["*"]
+ resources = ["...:payments-receipts/*"]

06

Verification workflow

After a change, the specific relationships that formed the path are reassessed. The question answered is whether the path still appears, not whether a ticket was closed.

BEFORE

4 edges · path present

Path identified

AFTER

3 edges · path broken

Not detected
Simulated verification

07

Architecture overview

Conceptually, context flows from data sources into a relationship model, through investigation and analysis, to human review. Only approved actions proceed, and every change is followed by reassessment.

Conceptual architecture
  1. 01Data Sources
  2. 02Context and Relationships
  3. 03Investigation and Risk Analysis
  4. 04Human Review
  5. 05Approved Action
  6. 06Reassessment

Interactive product preview

Run the illustrative investigation.

ZK-1042Simulated environment

Payment application attack path

Select a node, or use Tab and arrow keys, to inspect it.

Investigation steps

Run the simulated investigation to reveal each step of the example path.

Better context. Better security decisions.

Find the risks that matter.
Understand what to fix next.

Explore how connected security context could help your team investigate exposure, prioritize risk, and evaluate remediation.

Bring your security questions. Start with the workflow that matters most to your team.